| To Spank Or Not To Spank
A recent study of parenting patterns revealed that "more than
90 percent of parents (used) some form of corporal punishment on
their kids ages 2 to 4." If you have read extensively in the field
of parenting, you have discovered that parenting experts do not
agree on parenting methods. One study by the University of New Hampshire
(UNH) involving some 900 children, ages 1 to 4, found that "spanking
and other forms of corporal punishment may have a negative impact"
upon a child's "motivation to learn, brain development, (and) IQ."
It seems that parents who rarely or never spank spent "more time
reasoning with their children...That verbal interaction exercises
the brain and increases the neural connection," says Murray Straus,
Ph.D., a co-author of the UNH study. Parenting,
Febuary, 1999.
Next to love, discipline is a child's greatest need. But, let
us remember that the purpose of discipline is teaching. The most
important goal in all discipline is to help a child set his own
limits. T. Berry Brazatlon says, "When a parent uses physical punishment,
there is a dangerous message implied: 'Violence is the way to settle
issues.' We live in a violent culture today. Do we want to perpetuate
that message? Do we want to say, 'I can do this because I'm bigger
than you?'" Family Circle, 10/5/99.
Calleb Rosado, Ph.D. says, "Parents of problem kids repeatedly
fail to punish them for failing to obey. What frequently happens
is that they simply ignore everything until things get so out of
hand that, in frustration, the parents lash out. It is under such
circumstances again that abusive spanking arises." Message
Magazine, March/April, 1998.
Another factor to remember is that spanking
drastically alleviates guilt feelings. When a child is whipped,
he feels he has paid the price and his guilt is gone. Later, especially
during the adolescent years, these children will need the inner
controls of conscience and guilt. But let us ever remember that
disobedience cannot be tolerated. "No parent or teacher who has
at heart the well-being of those under his care will compromise
with the stubborn self-will that defies authority... Whipping may
be necessary when other resorts fail, yet she should not use the
rod if it is possible to avoid doing so...Frequently one such correction
will be enough for a lifetime, to show the child that he does not
hold the lines of control." Child Guidance,
pp. 236, 250.
Natural and Logical Consequences: This method
has many advantages over the reward and punishment approach. "First,
it holds children, not their parents, responsible for their behavior.
Second, it allows children to make their own decisions about what
courses of action are appropriate. Third, it permits children to
learn from the (impersonal) natural or social order of events rather
than forcing them to comply with the wishes of other persons. The
child who refuses to eat goes hungry. The child who insists on not
wearing mittens gets cold hands." Don Dinkmyer &
Gary D. McKay, The Parent's Handbook, p. 71.
When using this method, provide choices. For instance: "Sally,
we are trying to watch TV. You may settle down and watch the program
with us or leave the room. You decide which you would rather do."
Late for meals: Most parents will call several times, lecture, feed
them anyway after everyone else has finished. Better: Allow the
children to be responsible for getting themselves to the table.
Explain that meals will be served at a specific time and that you
will call them once and it is up to them to decide
whether or not to come. If they miss the meal, they go without food
until the next meal.
Don, 11 years old, has been asked repeatedly to put his bicycle
in the garage. But he forgets and leaves it on the driveway. Father
comes in limping one evening after falling over the bicycle in the
dark. "What's the matter, Dad?" "I fell over your bicycle in the
dark and hurt my knee. I'm too angry to talk about this now." (One
hour later.) "Don, I want to talk to you about responsibility. Do
you remember where the bicycle belongs?" "Dad, I'm sorry. I'll never
leave my bicycle out again." "This time there will be consequences.
Which would you prefer: to write a three-page theme on responsible
care of a bicycle, or have the bicycle locked up for three days?"
Waiting for one hour before discussing the issue gives Don's conscience
a chance to work. Writing a theme about responsible care of a bicycle
or taking the it away for three days is obviously a logical consequence
of the misbehavior.
Provide choices and accept the child's decision. Use a friendly
tone of voice that communicates your love. As you follow through
with a consequence, assure the child that God will help him to do
better if he will ask Him. Pray with him and for your children.
Be patient. It will take time for natural and logical consequences
to be effective, but it will pay big dividends.
|